Subintimal Tracking and Re-entry Technique for Stent-Jailed Side-Branch Occlusion.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and outcomes of treatment with the subintimal tracking and re-entry technique for stent-jailed side branch (SB-STAR). SB occlusion is a serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, conventional strategies may fail to recanalize the stent-jailed SB. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent elective PCI and were treated with SB-STAR at the Sapporo Cardiovascular Clinic in Japan. SB was treated for severe stenosis, reduced thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade, or ischemic signs after main vessel stenting. Technical success during the procedure and clinical and angiographic follow-up findings at 6 months were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 13,431 PCI procedures performed between January 2016 and June 2021, SB-STAR was performed in 10 patients. The angiographic success rate was 100%. At the 6-month follow-up, no deaths or target-vessel revascularizations had occurred. All patients underwent angiographic follow-up, and 8 of the 10 patients (80%) who underwent SB-STAR had confirmed patency. CONCLUSIONS: SB-STAR can be a bailout strategy to improve the critical situation of stent-jailed SB occlusion. At 6-month follow-up, the SB-STAR had good patency as well as good clinical outcomes.

The "needle re-entry" technique for infrainguinal arterial calcified occlusive lesions.

BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification is a predictor of poor clinical outcome during and after endovascular intervention. Guidewire crossing techniques and devices have been developed, but chronic total occlusions (CTOs) with severe calcification often prevent subintimal re-entry. We propose a novel guidewire crossing approach combined needle rendezvous with balloon snare technique, named the "needle re-entry" technique, for treatment of complex occlusive lesions. MAIN TEXT: A 73-year-old female with severe claudication in her right calf with ankle brachial index of 0.62, and a computed tomography angiogram showed a long occlusion with diffuse calcification in superficial femoral artery. She was referred to our department to have peripheral interventions. Since the calcified vascular wall of the lesion prevented the successful re-entry, the "needle re-entry" was performed. First, a retrograde puncture of the SFA, distally to the occlusion, was performed and an 0.018-in. guidewire with a microcatheter was inserted to establish a retrograde fashion. Second, an antegrade 5.0-mm balloon was advanced into a subintimal plane and balloon dilation at 6 atm was maintained. Third, an 18-gauge needle was antegradely inserted from distal thigh to the dilated 5.0-mm balloon. After confirming a balloon rupture by the needle penetration, we continued to insert the needle to meet the retrograde guidewire tip. Then, a retrograde 0.014-in. guidewire was carefully advanced into the needle hole, named the "needle rendezvous" technique. After further guidewire advancement to accomplish a guidewire externalization, the needle was removed. Finally, since the guidewire was passing through the 5.0-mm ruptured balloon, the balloon was withdrawn, and the guidewire was caught with the balloon and successfully advanced into the antegrade subintimal space, named the "balloon snare" technique. After the guidewire was advanced into the antegrade guiding sheath and achieved a guidewire externalization, an endovascular stent graft and an interwoven stent were deployed to cover the lesion. After postballoon dilation, an angiography showed a satisfactory result without complications. No restenosis, reintervention, and limb loss have been observed for one year follow-up period after this technique. CONCLUSIONS: The "needle re-entry" technique is a useful guidewire crossing technique to revascularize femoropopliteal complex CTOs with severe calcification which prevent the achievement of guidewire crossing with the conventional procedures.

Coil Embolization for Coronary Artery Perforation: A Retrospective Analysis of 110 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Coil embolization (CE) for coronary artery perforation (CAP) has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of myocardial damage and impact on cardiac function after CE for CAP. METHODS: A total of 110 consecutive patients treated with CE for CAP were retrospectively identified. The degree of myocardial damage and impact on cardiac function were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-nine (44.5%) cases involved chronic total occlusions. A guidewire was the cause of perforation in 97 (88.2%) patients. The success rate of CE was 98.2%. Almost all patients were prescribed either antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulant medication or both. Patients with perforation types III and IV were found to be prone to creatinine kinase (CK) elevation and epicardial main vessel perforation, thereby causing myocardial damage. No changes were noted in the ejection fraction (EF) in patients with type V distal perforation and collateral channel perforation, while patients with perforation of the epicardial main vessel may show impaired cardiac function afterward. CONCLUSIONS: CE is safe and effective for treating CAP, especially when collateral channels and distal vessels are involved. Meanwhile, efforts should be taken to prevent CAP in epicardial main vessels since it may be difficult to treat with CS and cause myocardial damage when bailed out with CE leading to vessel sacrifice. We found that it was not necessary to change the anticoagulant regimen after CE owing to its ability to achieve robust hemostasis.

Predictors of clinical outcome after rotational atherectomy-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in hemodialysis patients with severely calcified and diffused lesions is associated with extremely high rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), even when facilitated by rotational atherectomy (ROTA). Potential risk factors for MACE with ROTA-facilitated PCI in hemodialysis patients should be identified. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of patients from the Sapporo Cardiovascular Clinic database, who were on maintenance hemodialysis with severe calcified lesions and treated with ROTA-facilitated PCI. Clinical and interventional procedure characteristics were collected and compared between patients with and without MACE, defined as all-cause death, hospitalization due to heart failure, definite stent thrombosis, or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1-year follow-up. The individual outcomes of MACE and TLR in the cohort were presented as Kaplan-Meier percentages. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of MACE. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients undergoing hemodialysis and followed up for 362.50 (243.75, 382.25) days. Sixty-one patients in the cohort had MACE, most of which were TLR (47.5%, 29/61). Cumulative all-cause death at 30-day and 1-year follow-up were 6.52% and 18.8%, respectively. Patients with right coronary artery (RCA) lesions, in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions, and were more likely to have MACE, even with larger reference vessel diameter and greater acute gain after PCI. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that ISR lesion was positively associated with both MACE (HR 3.21, 95% CI: 1.59-6.48) and TLR (HR 5.08, 95% CI: 1.78-14.47), latter of which was also proved to be significantly related to greater acute gain (HR 1.95, 95% CI: 1.12-3.39). In subgroup analysis, RCA was found to be positively associated with MACE in de novo lesion (HR 2.83, 95% CI: 1.28-6.28). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the overall prognosis of ROTA-facilitated PCI in hemodialysis patients was poor. ISR was a significant risk factor for MACE, especially TLR.

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stent and Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty After Rotational Atherectomy in Severe Calcified and Large Coronary.

Drug-eluting stent (DES) is well known to be effective in severely calcified lesion after rotational atherectomy (ROTA). However, there are still some situations when stents should be avoided and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) should be the preferred option. The present study aims to explore whether POBA is comparably effective to DES in large and calcified coronary pretreated by ROTA in clinical outcomes.Consecutive patients treated for severely calcified lesions in the large (≥ 3 mm) coronary using ROTA + DES or ROTA + POBA were retrospectively analyzed. The major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause/cardiac death and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year and 2 years posttreatment, were compared between groups using the Cox regression analysis to identify independent predictors of TLR and MACE.The analysis included 285 cases in the ROTA + DES group and 47 cases in the ROTA + POBA group, without relevant differences in clinical baseline characteristics. Of note, lesion length was greater in the ROTA + DES group (37.2 versus 19.3 mm, P < 0.001); the ROTA + DES group had a higher rate of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, with 8.4%, and the ROTA + POBA group had none. The inhospital/30-day mortality rate (5.3%, ROTA + DES; 6.4%, ROTA + POBA) and the 12- and 24-month all-cause/cardiac mortality rate (9.3%, ROTA + DES; 7.7%, ROTA + POBA) were not significantly different between the two groups. TLR rates were not significantly different between the two groups at 12 (4.6%, ROTA + DES; 4.3%, ROTA + POBA) and 24 (5.3%, ROTA + DES; 6.4%, ROTA + POBA) months.Outcomes were comparable for ROTA + DES and ROTA + POBA in severely calcified large coronary artery intervention with respect to midterm death or TLR rate, especially for short lesion of < 20 mm.

Evolut Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Extremely Horizontal Aorta (Aortic Root Angle ≥ 70°).

Because of its rigidity and non-steerability, the presence of a horizontal aortic root poses a major anatomical issue during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Evolut self-expanding valve. Previous studies have elucidated the difficulties of coaxial implantation of the self-expanding valve in patients with horizontal aorta, often resulting in increased complications and a lower device success rate. To date, most patients with extremely horizontal aorta (aortic root angle ≥ 70°) have been excluded from major TAVR clinical trials. Therefore, available data on TAVR with Evolut in this challenging anatomy are limited, and standardized treatment strategies and clinical results remain unknown. Herein, we report a clinical case series of TAVR with Evolut in extremely horizontal aorta. Among seven patients (aged 80-92 years; STS score, 12.6% ± 7.9%) who underwent TAVR with Evolut system, aortic root angle ranged from 71° to 83° (mean, 75.1°± 4.5°). All patients achieved device success with dedicated strategies and were clinically stable at 3-month follow-up. None of the patients had more than mild paravalvular leakage (PVL) at any point during follow-up.Complications in three patients included complete atrioventricular block requiring a permanent pacemaker implantation, cerebral infarction because of atrial fibrillation 3 days after TAVR, and cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis. In this case series, Evolut self-expanding TAVR in extremely horizontal aorta was effective and feasible with a high device success rate. Based on anatomical features, some dedicated strategies majorly contribute to the success of this procedure. Large-scale multicenter studies are required to confirm our findings.

Reappraisal Value of a Modified Rotational Atherectomy Technique in Contemporary Coronary Angioplasty Era.

OBJECTIVES: To introduce a modified rotational atherectomy (RA) procedure and investigate the early and midterm outcomes of the RA-facilitating diversified percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a large group of aged patients with higher cardiovascular risk. BACKGROUND: Previous studies about the outcomes of RA were limited with small sample size and low-risk population. METHODS: Between January 2013 and November 2015, 1169 consecutive patients treated with modified RA-facilitated PCI were retrospectively enrolled, including de novo calcified lesions and in-stent restenosis. Patients were regularly followed up for at least 1 year. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were analyzed for all participants by different strategies. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for the events. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 75 years, with 11.7% of patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Most lesions (99.9%) were complex (American Heart Association type B2/C), and 68.3% were treated with RA + drug-eluting-stent (DES). Successful angiography was achieved in 97.8% cases, with 1.7% (20/1169) experiencing coronary perforation (including guidewire perforation). The incidence of MACE was 20.5% and 26.8% at 1-year and 2-year follow-up and were mainly driven by target lesion revascularization (TLR) (10.3% and 12.5%, respectively). The strategy of RA + DES had the lowest 2-year MACE, compared with the RA + drug-coated balloon and RA + plain old balloon angioplasty (14.5%, 30.5%, and 26.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The modified RA technique is a safe and effective tool in the contemporary PCI era, even in high-risk patients. The TLR rate was relatively high but acceptable in such complex lesions.

Treatment for in-stent restenosis requiring rotational atherectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) who underwent rotablation (RA) followed by balloon angioplasty (BA), drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, or drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Interventional treatment of ISR is occasionally challenging. Despite the availability of various percutaneous treatments, the optimal solution remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 200 patients with ISR who underwent RA were retrospectively identified from our institutional database. Clinical outcomes at 12 months and independent predictors of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were assessed. Of patients, 90, 55, and 55 underwent BA, DES implantation, and DCB angioplasty, respectively. The incidence of all-cause death, cardiac death, and hospitalization due to heart failure was low in all groups. Moreover, no definite stent thrombosis was observed in the three groups. The TLR rate of BA, DES implantation, and DCB angioplasty following RA for ISR were 40.7%, 35.0%, and 27.3%, respectively. The adjusted outcomes for TLR using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method based on propensity scores indicated that DCB angioplasty following RA was superior to BA after RA. Intraprocedural complications, which could be successfully managed with interventional treatment, were identified in only three cases. CONCLUSIONS: TLR at 12 months is dismal. RA is not effective for ISR requiring RA. In unfavorable settings, DCB angioplasty following RA is the most effective treatment option in patients with ISR requiring debulking strategy.

Rotational atherectomy and new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of rotational atherectomy (RA) followed by new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with an extensive amount of calcified and fibrotic plaque. BACKGROUND: RA followed by new-generation DES implantation for complex lesions has not been thoroughly evaluated. METHODS: A total of 744 consecutive patients (770 lesions) treated with new-generation DES implantation following RA for de novo lesions between January 2013 and November 2015 were retrospectively identified using our institutional database. Clinical outcomes at 12 months were evaluated and the independent predictors of all-cause death and target vessel failure (TVF) were assessed using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Target lesion revascularization occurred in 22 lesions (2.9%) and TVF occurred in 51 lesions (6.6%). In a multivariate analysis, hemodialysis, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, low ejection fraction, and HbA1c ≧ 7% were associated with 12-month mortality. Hemodialysis and right coronary artery were identified as independent predictors of TVF (hazard ratio (HR) 4.107, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.194-7.685, P < .001; HR 2.491, 95% CI 1.023-6.062, P = .044, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A good debulking with RA followed by new-generation DES implantation is recommended for patients with an excessive amount of calcified and fibrotic plaque, as this will likely improve the clinical outcomes.